Approssimazioni ed incompletezza dell'informazione.

Mi imbatto in questo post datato 07/11/2022 del solito Giorgio Bianchi che riprende un testo di Laura Ruggeri 

Si parla di disinformazione e di una risoluzione ONU osteggiata dai paesi "che si ergono paladini dei diritti umani e della democrazia, GIUSTIFICANO LA GLORIFICAZIONE DEL NAZISMO". La sig.ra Ruggeri, piuttosto che trarre questa affrettata conclusione, si dimentica di citare o leggere alcuni documenti relativi alla questione. Ovvero:

1 - Combating glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism and other practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance : resolution / adopted by the General Assembly https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3951466  dove si trova tutta la documentazione relativa alla risoluzione del 2021, da cui si evince che Ucraina e USA votarono contro e dove ci furono molti astenuti compresa l'Italia*, e da cui estrapolo l'intervento di Kyslytsya per l'Ucraina in risposta a Kuzmin della Federazione Russa durante l'assemblea generale ONU "Seventy-sixth session 53rd plenary meeting tenutasi "Thursday, 16 December 2021, 3 p.m." a New York

Mr. Kyslytsya (Ukraine): At the outset, I would like

to congratulate Ambassador Mohamed Said Doualeh

on the success of his chairmanship of one of the most

deliberative and human-centric Main Committees of

the General Assembly.

It is of particular concern that in the seventy-sixth

year of the United Nations existence, gross human rights

violations still persist in different parts of the world.

They are caused by deliberate disregard for international

law and undermining of the rules-based order.

Everyone can see the Russian so-called

“peacemakers” in Syria, Georgia and Ukraine — all

places where Russia set the earth on fire. Russia pretends

that its troops are not in the temporarily occupied

territories of Ukraine and that Russia is not an

occupying Power there. Still, even the Russian courts,

such as the court in the city of Kirov, recently decided

that Russian troops are there.

Yet the reports of international organizations and

their missions, which were invited by Ukraine, clearly

tell the contrary. They speak the truth in facts. Since

February 2014, the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and

the city of Sevastopol of Ukraine have been temporarily

occupied by the Russian Federation as a result of armed

aggression against my country. And that is a fact that is

very difficult to deny. Hence Russia was recognized as

an occupying Power by the General Assembly.

It is quite easy to understand the whole horror

of the Russian occupation regime, despite what the

Russian representative just said, as in the famous

Soviet propagandistic television show Vremya. One

has only to open two recent reports of the Secretary

General on the human rights situation in Crimea.

Repression, depression and hopelessness — that is

what local populations face today in the temporarily

occupied Crimea.

Systemic human rights abuses and violations have

turned Crimea into a land of fear, not a land of tourism

as the representative of the Russian Federation just said.

The Crimean Tatar people — the indigenous people of

the peninsula who were expelled from their homeland

in 1944 by the Stalin regime — have once again become

a direct target of intimidation, harassment and terror,

forcing them to leave.

Russia drives ethnic Ukrainians out of the peninsula

by destroying political and civic organizations of

Ukrainians, eliminating education in the Ukrainian

language — despite what the Russian representative

just said — persecuting leaders and activists exerting

massive psychological pressure and expelling citizens

of Ukraine from the occupied territory. Anyone who

dares to reject the so-called “reunification with Russia”

narrative becomes a victim of arbitrary detention,

prosecution, extrajudicial executions, torture and

in human treatment in Crimea We strongly condemn the sentencing of civic

and political activists prosecuted for being loyal to

their own country — Ukraine. Despite the demand

expressed in General Assembly resolutions, Mr. Emin

Usein Kuku still remains in a Russian prison, as does

Mr. Server Mustafayev, a human rights defender who

was arbitrarily sentenced to 14 years in a strict-regime

correctional facility. Hundreds of citizens of Ukraine,

including Halyna Dovhopola, Vladyslav Yesypenko and

Nariman Dzhelyal, to name just a few, remain illegally

detained by Russia under politically motivated charges.

The Orthodox Church of Ukraine is practically

expelled from the occupied peninsula. Communities of

Jehovah’s Witnesses and Muslims also face oppression.

Despite Russia’s forced imposition of its legal

system, residents of Crimea remain Ukrainians and my

country will spare no effort defending its citizens.

Meanwhile, Russia continues its aggressive

illegal policy to militarize the peninsula, exploit

natural resources and practice the illegal transfer

and destruction of the Ukrainian cultural heritage

in Crimea. The occupying Power pursues forcible

demographic change in Crimea.

The de-occupation of Crimea, as well as other

temporarily occupied territories, is an absolute priority

for Ukraine. We are grateful to our international

partners for their response to the Russian aggression

against Ukraine. It is important to maintain the political

and diplomatic pressure on the Kremlin until Ukraine’s

territorial integrity is restored.

To increase the effectiveness of the international

response to an array of problems arising from the

ongoing temporary occupation of Crimea, including

in the field of human rights, we established a new

consultation and coordination format: the International

Crimea Platform. We invite all interested parties to join

the Platform — in fact, we invited Russia itself — and

would like to thank our partners that already expressed

their support for the initiative.

Draft resolution III, entitled “Situation of human

rights in the temporarily occupied Autonomous Republic

of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine”, also

calls on cooperation within the International Crimea

Platform and will serve as a practical tool for the

United Nations, its Secretariat and the Organization for

Security and Cooperation in Europe and their respective

monitoring missions in Ukraine.

I am grateful to all Member States — and I am

not going to threaten any of them, like the Russian

representative just did — from all regions that supported

the draft resolution in the Third Committee. It is also

encouraging that the text received the co-sponsorship

of more than 40 Member States.

I ask Member States to vote in favour of draft

resolution III.

2 - che la risoluzione menzionata del 2022 per completezza di informazione era questa:

Seventy-seventh session

Third Committee

Agenda item 66 (a)

Elimination of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia

and related intolerance: elimination of racism, racial

discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance

Australia, Japan, Liberia and North Macedonia: amendment to draft

resolution A/C.3/77/L.5

Combating glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism and other

practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary forms of

racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance

Before operative paragraph 3, insert a new operative paragraph, reading:

Notes with alarm that the Russian Federation has sought to justify its territorial

aggression against Ukraine on the purported basis of eliminating neo-Nazism, and

underlines that the pretextual use of neo-Nazism to justify territorial aggression

seriously undermines genuine attempts to combat neo-Nazism;

3 - le ragioni per le quali nel 2021 gli USA (non ho trovato quella Ucraina ma credo sia assimilabile a questa) votò negativamente alla risoluzione sono riportate qui:

https://usun.usmission.gov/explanation-of-vote-at-the-third-committee-adoption-of-the-combating-glorification-of-nazism/

e sono 

Nicholas Hill

Deputy U.S. Representative for ECOSOC

New York, New York

November 12, 2021

Explanation of Vote at the Third Committee Adoption of the Combating Glorification of Nazism, Neo-Nazism and other Practices that Contribute to Fueling Contemporary Forms of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance Resolution

AS DELIVERED

Chair – As we mark the end of World War I with Armistice Day, the United States also joins the world community in commemorating the valiant sacrifice, heroism, and years-long struggle of all allied nations in the defeat of Nazi Germany in 1945 to end the Second World War. The United States joins those in the international community in condemning the glorification of Nazism and all forms of racism, xenophobia, discrimination, and intolerance. In fighting against the murderous ideology of Nazism, the United States fought for the freedom, dignity and human rights of all individuals and our steadfast commitment to preserving and protecting fundamental freedoms, including the freedom of expression.

Today, however, the United States must once again express opposition to this resolution, a document most notable for its thinly veiled attempts to legitimize Russian disinformation campaigns denigrating neighboring nations and promoting the distorted Soviet narrative of much of contemporary European history, using the cynical guise of halting Nazi glorification.

The United States Supreme Court has consistently affirmed the constitutional right to freedom of speech and the rights of peaceful assembly and association, including by avowed Nazis, whose hatred and xenophobia are vile and widely scorned by the American people. We nevertheless firmly defend the constitutional rights of those who exercise their fundamental freedoms to combat intolerance and express strong opposition to the odious Nazi creed and others that espouse similar hatreds.

We have again attempted this year to improve this resolution by engaging in negotiations on the draft text. Despite consistently expressing our concerns with the Russian delegation and proposing revisions to improve the text and protect against unacceptable restrictions on freedom of expression, most of these recommendations were ignored. We discourage States from invoking Article 4 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination and Article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in order to either silence unwelcome opinions or to excuse their failure to combat intolerance.

For these reasons, the United States has voted against each new version of this resolution since 2005 and is, again, compelled to vote “No” on this resolution, and calls on other States to do the same.

In conclusione, le informazioni, di questo tipo di importanza, non possono essere divulgate senza una completa ed esaustiva documentazione dei fatti, in alternativa rimangono ideologizzate e rimangono opinioni personali; opinioni deliberatamente volenterose di accomodare il pensiero di una schiera di persone che non ha voglia o che, peggio, non vuole approfondire le questioni che stanno alla base delle politiche e delle decisioni dei governi. Mettiamola come vogliamo, ma i governi sono influenzati dalle opinioni pubbliche, e il politico che vuole il potere non può altro che assecondarle per ottenere voti. Da qui la pericolosità delle informazioni divulgate a spizzichi e bocconi.

Redaelli Stefano

 *Votazioni alla risoluzione ONU del 2021 citata

AFGHANISTAN
A ALBANIA
Y ALGERIA
A ANDORRA
Y ANGOLA
Y ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA
Y ARGENTINA
Y ARMENIA
A AUSTRALIA
A AUSTRIA
Y AZERBAIJAN
Y BAHAMAS
Y BAHRAIN
Y BANGLADESH
Y BARBADOS
Y BELARUS
A BELGIUM
Y BELIZE
Y BENIN
Y BHUTAN
Y BOLIVIA (PLURINATIONAL STATE OF)
Y BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Y BOTSWANA
Y BRAZIL
Y BRUNEI DARUSSALAM
A BULGARIA
Y BURKINA FASO
Y BURUNDI
Y CABO VERDE
Y CAMBODIA
Y CAMEROON
A CANADA
Y CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC
Y CHAD
Y CHILE
Y CHINA
Y COLOMBIA
Y COMOROS
CONGO
Y COSTA RICA
Y CÔTE D'IVOIRE
A CROATIA
Y CUBA
A CYPRUS
A CZECHIA
Y DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO
A DENMARK
Y DJIBOUTI
DOMINICA
Y DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
Y ECUADOR
Y EGYPT
Y EL SALVADOR
Y EQUATORIAL GUINEA
Y ERITREA
A ESTONIA
Y ESWATINI
Y ETHIOPIA
Y FIJI
A FINLAND
A FRANCE
Y GABON
Y GAMBIA
A GEORGIA
A GERMANY
Y GHANA
A GREECE
Y GRENADA
Y GUATEMALA
Y GUINEA
Y GUINEA-BISSAU
Y GUYANA
Y HAITI
Y HONDURAS
A HUNGARY
A ICELAND
Y INDIA
Y INDONESIA
IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF)
Y IRAQ
A IRELAND
Y ISRAEL
A ITALY
Y JAMAICA
A JAPAN
Y JORDAN
Y KAZAKHSTAN
Y KENYA
Y KIRIBATI
Y KUWAIT
Y KYRGYZSTAN
Y LAO PEOPLE'S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC
A LATVIA
Y LEBANON
Y LESOTHO
LIBERIA
Y LIBYA
A LIECHTENSTEIN
A LITHUANIA
A LUXEMBOURG
Y MADAGASCAR
Y MALAWI
Y MALAYSIA
Y MALDIVES
Y MALI
A MALTA
MARSHALL ISLANDS
Y MAURITANIA
Y MAURITIUS
Y MEXICO
MICRONESIA (FEDERATED STATES OF)
A MONACO
Y MONGOLIA
A MONTENEGRO
Y MOROCCO
MOZAMBIQUE
Y MYANMAR
Y NAMIBIA
Y NAURU
Y NEPAL
A NETHERLANDS
A NEW ZEALAND
Y NICARAGUA
Y NIGER
Y NIGERIA
A NORTH MACEDONIA
A NORWAY
Y OMAN
Y PAKISTAN
PALAU
Y PANAMA
Y PAPUA NEW GUINEA
Y PARAGUAY
Y PERU
Y PHILIPPINES
A POLAND
A PORTUGAL
Y QATAR
A REPUBLIC OF KOREA
A REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
A ROMANIA
Y RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Y RWANDA
Y SAINT KITTS AND NEVIS
Y SAINT LUCIA
Y SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES
A SAMOA
A SAN MARINO
SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE
Y SAUDI ARABIA
Y SENEGAL
Y SERBIA
Y SEYCHELLES
Y SIERRA LEONE
Y SINGAPORE
A SLOVAKIA
A SLOVENIA
A SOLOMON ISLANDS
Y SOMALIA
Y SOUTH AFRICA
Y SOUTH SUDAN
A SPAIN
Y SRI LANKA
Y SUDAN
Y SURINAME
A SWEDEN
A SWITZERLAND
Y SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
Y TAJIKISTAN
Y THAILAND
Y TIMOR-LESTE
Y TOGO
A TONGA
Y TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
Y TUNISIA
A TURKEY
Y TURKMENISTAN
TUVALU
Y UGANDA
N UKRAINE
Y UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
A UNITED KINGDOM
Y UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA
N UNITED STATES
Y URUGUAY
Y UZBEKISTAN
Y VANUATU
Y VENEZUELA (BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF)
Y VIET NAM
Y YEMEN
Y ZAMBIA
Y ZIMBABWE